Every
author develops a toolkit containing writing skills and techniques, preferred
software and hardware, and proven processes to develop a polished manuscript.
I’d like to suggest authors add the Auditory Read Through to their stockpile of
available tools.
If
you are like most modern authors, you compose your first draft using a
word-processing program, which means you first see your words on a screen. You
may rewrite your manuscript using a screen to display your text, or you may
print out a copy of your manuscript, make handwritten corrections and then
convert those back to an electronic form.
Many
authors have learned that they find different problems when they view their
manuscript on the screen compared to what they find when using a hard copy. I
suggest that you will also discover different issues when you read your
manuscript out loud.
Even
if on previous read throughs you silently sounded things out in your head, you
did not fully utilize your sense of hearing. Before the written word, stories
were spoken, and you should listen to yours to discover a few last issues you may
have missed.
My approach to the Auditory Read Through
I
print out the manuscript single-spaced applying the same font, type size, lines
per page and page size as the publisher will use. As I read, I’ll see, for
example, a long paragraph that needs splitting or dialogue that runs unbroken
for two pages. [I am not worrying about exact layout, orphan lines, where words
break on a line, or anything like that.
What
am I listening for? Anything that doesn’t sound right on a sentence-by-sentence
basis, as well as considering a paragraph or page as a whole. Whenever I
stumble or trip over a word, there is a good chance I need to rewrite
something. This gives me the opportunity to straighten convoluted sentences and
exchange flabby diction with precise wording.
Often
on the read through I’ll discover I used a word several times within a short
span. I never saw the multiple uses on screen or page, but my ear picks it up.
I
pay particular attention to adverbs: are they covering for a flabby verb? Make
sure every
adverb is necessary. As an example consider the line “She quickly walked to the
sidewalk.” With the multitude of verbs available to describe exactly how she
moved to the sidewalk, this sentence employs a lazy approximation for what the
reader should visualize as they read.
Where
I used multiple adjectives, can I replace them with one perfect descriptor?
Have
I noun-ized verbs (xxxxx-ness) or verbed nouns (xxxxx-ize)?
Are
my verbs ending with “ing” appropriate?
Have
I fallen into a repetitive pattern? Do too many sentences share the same form?
Are sentences all the same length?
You
can do as I do, printing out the manuscript and reading it aloud to yourself,
or you can use software that reads the words to you. I’ve tried both and they
both work well. Using software has the added advantage that you use only your
ears, since you aren’t the one reading. Plus, it can be entertaining when the
software butchers a word it doesn’t know.
Some
people record themselves reading their manuscript out loud. While they are
reading, they muzzle the internal editor. Once they start the playback, they
are truly listening (since they are not also reading). I haven’t used this
technique, but it is intriguing, although it seems like extra work—but folks
swear by it, and I may try it sometime.
I
find the best time in my manuscript creation process for the Auditory Read
Through is once I think the manuscript is ready for a final nit check. You may
want to wait until you believe you have polished the manuscript to perfection.
Others may find it’s useful much earlier in their process.
If
you’ve tried the technique, how did you think it worked for you? If you haven’t
performed an Auditory Read Through, do you think you might?
~ Jim
This post first appeared 8/24/16 on the Lyrical Pens Blog
