Last week a five-minute blast of very high straight winds
hit our property in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. In the hundred feet between our
house and cabin and the lake, we lost all or parts of eight large trees: three
hemlocks, two spruces, one cedar, and two maples. I haven’t explored the south
end of my near-shore property, so there could be more. I have traveled most of the
paths that wander through the remainder of my eighty acres looking for damage and
found nothing major.
Why the disparity in damage levels, and does this have any larger significance beyond me having serious chainsaw work ahead of me?
 |
| View of lake 2013. Note density of trees and short understory |
When I bought the land in 1997, the trees at the lake’s edge
were generally towering white pines and sprawling white cedars. The next tier
of forest consisted of black spruce (60%), white pines and white spruce (10%),
and deciduous trees (mostly red maple, white birch, quaking aspen – 30%).
Beyond that 100-foot line, the deciduous trees became dominant with evergreens accounting
for at most a quarter of the trees.
The black spruce were already starting to die from blight. A
diseased tree would first exhibit the problem in the fall when many of the
needles at the treetop turned yellow. By the next fall, the tree would be dead,
and within three years the top would blow off, leaving a twenty-five-foot stub,
which generally fell in the following decade. After twenty years of this
infestation, perhaps five percent of black spruce near the lake remain.
 |
| The understory 2017 |
The spruce deaths have opened the understory for new growth,
and a mass of balsam, pine, and hemlock have reached up to fifteen feet tall. During
this period, a few of the white pines, which were already past their prime and
on their decline, have also died, losing their needles and dropping branches as
the years pass. A third source of destruction occurred when beaver “harvested”
up to a third of the large deciduous trees in that first hundred feet,
including almost all of those at or very close to the water.
One advantage of all this woods-thinning is that we have a
much better view of the lake from our house than when we first built it. The
bad news is that when we consider the density of trees taller than twenty-five
feet in that first one-hundred feet, there is no forest. Those trees have
become a collection of individuals.
 |
| More open view of lake 2017 (of course it was foggy the day I took this) |
Those of you without significant forest experience may not
realize that trees in a forest grow differently compared to the same tree in a
suburban yard. Because of the lack of competition in the yard, trees grow out,
expanding their canopy using long limbs that require thick trunks. The quest for
canopy space in a forest requires rapid vertical growth. Light reaching the
floor of a forest signals affected trees to grow tall as quickly as they can so
they can grab that small spot in the canopy. Lower limbs are quickly abandoned.
Strengthening the trunk takes a back seat to reaching height quickly. This
results in tall, thin trees whose trunks are often brittle.
Twenty years ago, high winds that whipped across the lake were
met by a dense collection of trees. Pines formed the core of the defensive
front. Tall and supple and strong, and backed up by the large numbers of spruce
behind them, they forced much of the wind to deflect up and over the forest.
Now the big trees are isolated, with large gaps between. High winds are no
longer deflected up; they retain their strength, sweeping past the pines, and
pounding individual trees with their full force.
The unbroken wind uses the densely packed needles to apply extra
leverage to individual trees, causing those cedar and spruce trees with shallow
or weakened root systems to tip over. Trees with stronger root systems, like
maples, birches, and hemlocks, remain standing, but the unchecked winds apply immense
force to their leafed out or needled upper portions. If the trunk has a weaker
spot, the winds can rip the tops of those trees off their bases. This is what
happened to the hemlocks and maples.
Collectively, the forest—before it was weakened by disease,
old age, and beaver—could withstand almost any straight winds with only minor
damage to the tall trees. Individually, trees are hard-pressed to sustain the
periodic battering we receive in the U.P.
The birch and maple trees initially benefited when the
black spruce died and dropped to the forest floor. There was more light for
them. Their roots had less competition. When the beaver wreaked its
devastation, it didn’t chew down the evergreens, leaving the towering hemlocks to
stand alone. When a huge pine died, all the other trees grew faster using the extra
light.
The tall trees that remain now claim a disproportionate
share of the natural resources. Their leaves or needles gather most of the
light. Their extensive root systems, hidden under the ground, absorb most of
the water and nutrients.
The tall trees are now this forest’s billionaires. The black
spruce were the forest’s middle class: hollowed by a disease that benefited
those at the top of the food chain that claimed much of the canopy and feasted
on the nutrients released to the soil. The understory trees are the forest’s working
poor, struggling to get by on the scraps left by the big trees, but flourishing
where they do receive enough light.
Those billionaire trees are living on borrowed time. When
the winds come, the eviscerated middle class can no longer support them, and
one by one they will be toppled.
~ Jim
This blog first published 17 July 2017 on Writers Who Kill.
