A recent Gallup poll (Nov. 2-8, 2017) put Congress’s
approval rating at 13%, disapproval at 81%, and 6% with no opinion. The short
answer why so many disapprove is that we believe the vast majority are
unprincipled.
Principled politicians carry the same core beliefs whether
they are in power or out of power.
House Republicans yesterday again demonstrated their that belief
in state’s rights applies only when they’re not the ones telling the states how
to act. If enacted, the law they passed and sent to the Senate would allow
anyone with a legal concealed-carry right in their own state to take that right
with them when they travel to states with more restrictive policies. For
example. Arizonians, who do not need any permit for their concealed-carry,
would be able to conceal their guns while traveling in Maryland, which has a very
strict concealed-carry policy.
One might cynically think this vote is a payback to the
National Rifle Association, which has been pushing this, for their contributions.
That may be, but it also shows the Republican Congress believes it knows better
than Maryland what their citizens really need. Funny, how when the Federal
Government under Democratic control proclaimed transgender people should be
able to use the bathroom of their choice—well, that was gross overreach and an
issue that should be left to the states.
President Trump’s shrinking of two Utah national monuments
illustrates a lack of principles by both parties. Many Republicans have
maintained that states should have free rein to manage national lands “because
they know best.” One can and should discuss whether lands acquired by treaty
belong to the whole nation or should be deeded to the state in which they
belong. Regardless of one’s personal position, Trump has consistently said
national lands should be run by and for the states. By that measure, his
trimming of the monuments is principled.
However, candidate Trump and Republicans in general decried
President Obama’s executive orders and proclamations as unlawful, unconstitutional
overreaches of presidential power. Yet once he became President Trump, and with
Congressional Republicans cheering along, he has used these same strategies to
pursue Republican objectives.
Democrats do not show principles, either. Many Democrats are
now decrying President Trump’s “overreach.” Such decisions should be left to
Congress they now say, ignoring their eight years of approving President
Obama’s use of executive power to achieve his agenda.
Elections should, of course, have ramifications. Those who
support the policies put in place during the Obama administration will not look
favorably on Republican changes. They should have done a better job of electing
their candidates. To decry the mechanism of power now that they don’t control
the levers is not defensible.
However, Republicans have learned nothing from the mistakes Democrats
made in unilaterally passing legislation with sweeping national consequences.
Democrats pushed through Obamacare without soliciting expert opinion on all the
consequences. The public did not like it then, in large part because Democrats
never brought them into the process; Democrats overstated some and never
clearly explained other benefits (remember “nobody will lose their insurance”?),
and they never admitted to the costs.
The Republican tax bill process has done them one better on
all these counts. Only 32% of people approve the plan, while 48% oppose it, and
20% don’t know enough to do either.
Republicans universally decried Democrats for pushing
through “Obamacare” without bipartisan input—and have sunk even lower with
their tax bill by rushing through a 500-page bill with repercussions that
affect every individual in the US.
The process is deeply flawed. It has been said that people
would be sickened to see how either sausage or legislation is made. Making
last-minute changes and pulling all-nighters didn’t work well when we were in
high school and college, so why does Congress think their constituents would
applaud this approach to running the country? Politics, as Bismarck said, is
the art of the possible and requires compromise.
Last January, Senators Grassley and Lee introduced an
amendment to the constitution to require the Federal government to have a
balanced budget. Without the new tax legislation, we are running budget
deficits of a half-trillion dollars a year. Both senators voted for a tax cut that
will increase Federal debt by over a trillion dollars. In the House, multiple
balanced budget amendment bills have been introduced and co-sponsored by
Republicans who voted for the tax cut.
Kudos to Senator Corker who did take a principled stand
against increasing the deficit and voted against the bill.
No principles. No respect. No solving the enormous financial
problems facing our country.
No comments:
Post a Comment