As many of you know, Jan and I recently
embarked on a nearly two-week vacation with the primary purpose of enjoying
ourselves in new territory and experiencing the aurora borealis. The pictures
decorating this blog are ones I took on this trip. Neither of us had ever
been to Churchill, Manitoba or anywhere on Hudson’s Bay, and we enjoyed the
two-day train ride up from Winnipeg. Jan had never seen the northern lights,
but I had seen them on several occasions in the vicinity of our camp in
Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The most recent had been more than a decade ago.
I had stood on a low hill in a clearcut (now filled with
twenty-five-foot larch) with open northerly views and watched a shimmering of
greens appear with a fleck here and there of red or purple. Each time I had
seen them, I had prior notice because the experts had detected a major solar
event that they expected would trigger excellent displays.
It turns out those northern light views I experienced were
akin to the blast of newfound love: brilliant, colorful, shimmering in
excitement, leaving me breathless and a bit dizzy. What I came to realize on
this trip is that, unless one is exposed to a major solar occurrence or one has
prepared themselves to see the colors, we witness the more typical aurora
borealis (in its long-term love affair with earth’s magnetic field) as silver.
Our visual hardware causes us problems in our quest of
magnificent colors in auroras. Our eyes have two sensors, rods and cones. In a
simple model of sight, rods allow us to see in low light levels. Cones are
effective in brighter light. Rods do not provide color vision. Cones come in
three flavors and generate electrical currents that allow our brains to “see”
color.
That’s the problem: at night, we have low light. That
requires rods and yields no color. To get our cones involved and generate color,
the light must be brighter—or we need to have sensitized our eyes to the
darkness. For the impatient among us who would like to rush out from our
well-lit houses to see the aurora, our cones have no chance to acclimate.
As an example, think of what happens when we rush in from
the brilliant sunlight of the beach and enter the dark of the men’s or ladies’
room. We can’t see a thing. Our cones are still stimulated from the sun
bouncing off sand and water, and all we see is a smear of white. Our rods are
still on break, off smoking a cigarette or chatting up the lovelies at the concession
stand because, as far as they knew, there was nothing for them to do.
My few experiences with northern lights in Michigan had been
on evenings when the lights were bright and my cones were able to paint the
scene in color. Our first night in Churchill, we had a very nice display—and for
me (and everyone else) it was all white. After that experience, I now believe
many of the times I went out to look at northern lights in Michigan and believed
I had not seen them, I had in fact witnessed the display without realizing it.
I thought I saw only patterns of high cirrus clouds and did not recognize them
for what they were.
On our second night in Churchill, Jan and I were two of only
four in our group of twelve who stayed up late enough to witness the northern
lights. Around 12:30 a.m. this aurora borealis started very softly, but soon
built into a rollicking dance of light, some of which was bright enough (and I
had been outside for over an hour) that I once again saw patterns of dancing
greens.
That aurora spanned the heavens with an arc I’d estimate at
almost 1200, and reached high into the sky. It was so massive that
even with my 17mm lens, I could not catch it all in one photograph.
The third night it snowed. The aurora may have been burning
bright, but we weren’t about to see it. Having been up two nights in a row
until after two in the morning, I took it as a sign that I had nurtured my soul
the previous evenings and that going to bed early was appropriate to nurture my
body.
We left Churchill the evening of the fourth day and were
treated to more northern lights as we awaited our plane. I stood in the airport
parking lot, lit by sodium lamps, and once again saw splashes of color in the
aurora. As an extra treat, we saw the aurora (back to silver) from the airplane
as we flew to Winnipeg.
So what did I learn?
My camera sees much better in low light than I do. Its
cone-equivalents can gather light for twenty or twenty-five seconds before
rendering an image. My eyes can’t accumulate light in the same fashion as they
are required to report to my brain on a continual basis. Patience is indeed a
virtue. Some nights the aurora did not start until quite late. Often the
initial burst of aurora activity would die out, only to return much later with
an even more brilliant display. Even though I had read a book on auroras and
understood how and why they are created, I had not considered how my eyesight
would affect what I would and would not see.
I am a really, really lucky person. I appreciate that and do
not want to forget it.
~ Jim
P.S. Here's a picture of a boreal chickadee and his reflection for those who might think I only looked skyward on this trip.
This blog originally appeared on the Writers Who Kill blog, 3/20/2016
Great post, Jim. The aurora is on my bucket list, and it makes sense to me now why I might not have seen a display by just looking out the window or running outside to check the sky.
ReplyDeleteKarla -- did I mention to look toward the north? :)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the info, Jim! We've actually seen the northern lights a couple of times in the UP when we went light chasing. Both times we stopped taking photos waiting for it to get more spectacular. Now I know the camera might have captured the "more spectacular" occurrence our eyes were unable to see!
ReplyDeleteFinding a spot along Lake Superior far enough away from city lights would make for excellent Northern Lights viewing.
Delete